Exploring LiDAR as a Scalable Photonic Alternative to Turbidimeters for Water Turbidity Monitoring

Authors

  • Nur Aina Athirah Mohd Nizar
  • Juliza Jamaludin Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Bandar Baru Nilai, 71800 Nilai Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
  • Marinah Othman Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Bandar Baru Nilai, 71800 Nilai Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5894-5379

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53655/joe.s4382y

Keywords:

Turbidity, LiDAR, Signal strength

Abstract

Water turbidity is a critical parameter for assessing water quality, conventionally measured using turbidimeters that rely on nephelometric light scattering. While effective, these instruments are constrained to labor-intensive sampling, limiting spatial and delayed data analysis. This paper explores the potential of LiDAR which a photonics-based ranging technology as an alternative method for turbidity assessment. Both turbidimeters and LiDAR operate on light-particle interaction principles. In this research, a compact TFmini-S LiDAR sensor was used in a controlled laboratory setup to observe signal strength changes in relation to turbidity levels measured by a conventional turbidimeter. Though limited in range, the sensor will be use to demonstrate a relationship between signal attenuation and turbidity. These results will provide foundational support for the future use of LiDAR in scalable, non-contact, real-time turbidity monitoring. The study invites further exploration into adapting LiDAR for broader environmental water quality applications.

References

S. M. Pershin, B. G. Katsnelson, M. Y. Grishin, V. N. Lednev, V. A. Zavozin, and I. Ostrovsky, “Laser remote sensing of lake kinneret by compact fluorescence lidar,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 19, p. 7307, Sep. 2022, ISSN: 1424-8220. DOI: 10.3390/s22197307

V. I. Chernook, A. N. Vasilyev, Y. A. Goldin, B. A. Gureev, V. S. Goryainov, and A. A. Buznikov, “Oceanological monitoring of fishing areas using lidars,” in 2014 International Conference Laser Optics, IEEE, Jun. 2014, pp. 1–1. DOI: 10.1109/lo.2014.6886388

J. Ivanovs and M. Kriev¯ans, “Using LIDAR topography data for determination of morphology and terrace levels of the River Ogre Valley in Middle Latvia Lowland [abstract].,” Geology, Geophysics & Environment, vol. 42, no. 1, p. 76, 2016, ISSN: 0138-0974. DOI: 10.7494/geol.2016.42.1.76

J. W. O’Dell, Determination of turbidity by nephelometry, https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-08/documents/method_180-1_1993.pdf, Ohio: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Aug. 1993.

D. G. Bowers, E. M. Roberts, A. M. Hoguane, K. A. Fall, G. M. Massey, and C. T. Friedrichs, “Secchi disk measurements in turbid water,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, vol. 125, no. 5, May 2020, ISSN: 2169-9291. DOI: 10.1029/2020jc016172

A. Jain, R. Jain, and S. Jain, “Digital nephelometer,” in Basic Techniques in Biochemistry, Microbiology and Molecular Biology. Springer US, 2020, pp. 23–24, ISBN: 9781493998616. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9861-6_11

ISO 7027-1:2016 Water quality - Determination of turbidity Part 1: Quantitative methods, ISO, 2016.

S. Palmer et al., “Ultraviolet fluorescence lidar (ufl) as a measurement tool for water quality parameters in turbid lake conditions,” Remote Sensing, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 4405–4422, Sep. 2013, ISSN: 2072-4292. DOI:10.3390/rs5094405

Downloads

Published

05-11-2025

How to Cite

Mohd Nizar, N. A. A. ., Jamaludin, J., & Othman, M. (2025). Exploring LiDAR as a Scalable Photonic Alternative to Turbidimeters for Water Turbidity Monitoring. Jurnal OptoElektronik, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.53655/joe.s4382y

Issue

Section

TMP2025: Regular